OFFICIAL JOSH JACKSON THREAD
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> NBA Draft Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
leor_77
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 21920

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 9:51 pm    Post subject: OFFICIAL JOSH JACKSON THREAD

Defense, length, size, athleticism - Good efficiency shooting from two and from three. There is an avalanche of Ball hype going around right now, but I'm leaning Jackson.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 9:53 pm    Post subject:

OMG.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DangeRuss
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 1418

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 9:55 pm    Post subject:

I love Jackson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
mad55557777
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 24072

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 9:57 pm    Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL JOSH JACKSON THREAD

leor_77 wrote:
Defense, length, size, athleticism - Good efficiency shooting from two and from three. There is an avalanche of Ball hype going around right now, but I'm leaning Jackson.

Stromile swift,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DrDent
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 30 Jun 2016
Posts: 12975

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 9:58 pm    Post subject:

Count me in as well. The thought of Ingram and Jackson stalking the perimeter and defending wing players....love it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 48602

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 9:59 pm    Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL JOSH JACKSON THREAD

mad55557777 wrote:
leor_77 wrote:
Defense, length, size, athleticism - Good efficiency shooting from two and from three. There is an avalanche of Ball hype going around right now, but I'm leaning Jackson.

Stromile swift,


I remember people thinking Swift was gonna be special... I hope this draft doesn't disappoint.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
fiendishoc
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 8488
Location: The (real) short corner

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:01 pm    Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL JOSH JACKSON THREAD

mad55557777 wrote:
leor_77 wrote:
Defense, length, size, athleticism - Good efficiency shooting from two and from three. There is an avalanche of Ball hype going around right now, but I'm leaning Jackson.

Stromile swift,


Jackson has good feel for the game, basketball IQ, so not sure where you're going with that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
socalsp3
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Posts: 3566

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:08 pm    Post subject:

Character issues and lack of a J. With ingram your likely future SF having JJ another SF doesn't exactly entice PG13 to sign.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
fontana3d
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 3794

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:11 pm    Post subject:

Josh Jackson=Possible PG13 replacement in Indiana.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerMindLA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Posts: 5344

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:13 pm    Post subject:

Funny thing with Jackson is if you go back to FIBA Games with Team USA, Jackson was thought as being the next great SG/SF based on his ability to create from the perimeter.

One year at Kansas as a undersized PF and everyones view on him has changed.

If Jackson develops a consistent jumper, he will end up the best player from this draft.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
leor_77
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 21920

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:13 pm    Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL JOSH JACKSON THREAD

mad55557777 wrote:
leor_77 wrote:
Defense, length, size, athleticism - Good efficiency shooting from two and from three. There is an avalanche of Ball hype going around right now, but I'm leaning Jackson.

Stromile swift,


So...anyone can play that game with any player. What if I took Ball, and said that he'll be the next Austin Rivers or Jonny Flynn?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Showtime__79
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 16 Apr 2017
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:13 pm    Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL JOSH JACKSON THREAD

leor_77 wrote:
Defense, length, size, athleticism - Good efficiency shooting from two and from three. There is an avalanche of Ball hype going around right now, but I'm leaning Jackson.


Your forgot about great passer!!!





He's a jump shot away from being a superstar!!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
leor_77
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 21920

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:14 pm    Post subject:

socalsp3 wrote:
Character issues and lack of a J. With ingram your likely future SF having JJ another SF doesn't exactly entice PG13 to sign.


About 51% from the field, and 38% from three. You mind doing some research before you talk out of your ass?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Andre2K
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 12199

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:15 pm    Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL JOSH JACKSON THREAD

mad55557777 wrote:
leor_77 wrote:
Defense, length, size, athleticism - Good efficiency shooting from two and from three. There is an avalanche of Ball hype going around right now, but I'm leaning Jackson.

Stromile swift,


Justise Winslow
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Showtime__79
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 16 Apr 2017
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:15 pm    Post subject:

socalsp3 wrote:
Character issues and lack of a J. With ingram your likely future SF having JJ another SF doesn't exactly entice PG13 to sign.


Start Jackson/PG and BI will be super six man that finish games similar to Odom!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
leor_77
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 21920

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:17 pm    Post subject:

Also, I'm getting pretty sick and tired of hearing from Lavar Ball. It was funny for a while, but it's becoming pretty scary to think about having to hear from him every day.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Villain6Activated
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 6697

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:18 pm    Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL JOSH JACKSON THREAD

Inspector Gadget wrote:
mad55557777 wrote:
leor_77 wrote:
Defense, length, size, athleticism - Good efficiency shooting from two and from three. There is an avalanche of Ball hype going around right now, but I'm leaning Jackson.

Stromile swift,


I remember people thinking Swift was gonna be special... I hope this draft doesn't disappoint.


wait.. you're not 15 years old?
_________________
“Life is too short. You have to keep it moving.” - Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tj24
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 651

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:19 pm    Post subject:

That's my guy. I hope he kills the workout and blows them away. The thought of him and Ingram on the wings for the next 10 years is $$$
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
socalsp3
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Posts: 3566

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:19 pm    Post subject:

Showtime__79 wrote:
socalsp3 wrote:
Character issues and lack of a J. With ingram your likely future SF having JJ another SF doesn't exactly entice PG13 to sign.


Start Jackson/PG and BI will be super six man that finish games similar to Odom!


So you waste your #2 pick and bench him

Spend two #2 picks and a max contract on one position is not ideal to building a well tounded team.


Last edited by socalsp3 on Wed May 17, 2017 10:22 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pjiddy
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 29731

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:22 pm    Post subject:

socalsp3 wrote:
Showtime__79 wrote:
socalsp3 wrote:
Character issues and lack of a J. With ingram your likely future SF having JJ another SF doesn't exactly entice PG13 to sign.


Start Jackson/PG and BI will be super six man that finish games similar to Odom!


So you waste your #2 pick and bench him


I'm sure he'd come off the bench in the beginning. Eventually i could see him at the 2 next to DLO.

One pro to drafting Jackson is i'm pretty we'd have to keep Russell at that point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
socalsp3
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Posts: 3566

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:24 pm    Post subject:

pjiddy wrote:
socalsp3 wrote:
Showtime__79 wrote:
socalsp3 wrote:
Character issues and lack of a J. With ingram your likely future SF having JJ another SF doesn't exactly entice PG13 to sign.


Start Jackson/PG and BI will be super six man that finish games similar to Odom!


So you waste your #2 pick and bench him


I'm sure he'd come off the bench in the beginning. Eventually i could see him at the 2 next to DLO.

One pro to drafting Jackson is i'm pretty we'd have to keep Russell at that point.
hed play his natural position at SG. There isnt a better option at SG imsure they keep him if they draft a PG

Im not sure that keeping DLo at the 1 is a pro


Last edited by socalsp3 on Wed May 17, 2017 10:25 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
bonkers
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Apr 2013
Posts: 6071

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:24 pm    Post subject:

pjiddy wrote:
socalsp3 wrote:
Showtime__79 wrote:
socalsp3 wrote:
Character issues and lack of a J. With ingram your likely future SF having JJ another SF doesn't exactly entice PG13 to sign.


Start Jackson/PG and BI will be super six man that finish games similar to Odom!


So you waste your #2 pick and bench him


I'm sure he'd come off the bench in the beginning. Eventually i could see him at the 2 next to DLO.

One pro to drafting Jackson is i'm pretty we'd have to keep Russell at that point.


You ask a bunch of people around here and that'd be a con
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DrDent
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 30 Jun 2016
Posts: 12975

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:27 pm    Post subject:

tj24 wrote:
That's my guy. I hope he kills the workout and blows them away. The thought of him and Ingram on the wings for the next 10 years is $$$


Qft!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DrDent
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 30 Jun 2016
Posts: 12975

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:28 pm    Post subject:

pjiddy wrote:
socalsp3 wrote:
Showtime__79 wrote:
socalsp3 wrote:
Character issues and lack of a J. With ingram your likely future SF having JJ another SF doesn't exactly entice PG13 to sign.


Start Jackson/PG and BI will be super six man that finish games similar to Odom!


So you waste your #2 pick and bench him


I'm sure he'd come off the bench in the beginning. Eventually i could see him at the 2 next to DLO.

One pro to drafting Jackson is i'm pretty we'd have to keep Russell at that point.


Or trade bait....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
sogood.
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Oct 2015
Posts: 1821

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:33 pm    Post subject:

.

Last edited by sogood. on Wed May 17, 2017 10:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> NBA Draft All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB