View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lakerfan 4 Life Franchise Player
Joined: 16 Apr 2001 Posts: 16169
|
Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lakers select....hometown boy Josh Jackson! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sogood. Star Player
Joined: 17 Oct 2015 Posts: 1821
|
Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
leor_77 wrote: | socalsp3 wrote: | Character issues and lack of a J. With ingram your likely future SF having JJ another SF doesn't exactly entice PG13 to sign. |
About 51% from the field, and 38% from three. You mind doing some research before you talk out of your ass? |
lol you should do your research before you call out other posters. It's well known that his weakness is shooting. He is shooting 20% on off the dribble mid range shots, that is horrific. 28% on attempts in pick and roll and iso situations.
If you actually watch one of his games you would know that defender will sag off of him. Right now a lot of analysts agree that he can not shoot from the NBA 3.
Justise Winslow shot 42% from 3 when he was at Duke on more attempts than Jackson. He shot 19% this past season from 3.
Not to mention Jackson is shooting 56% on his free throws. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Batguano Star Player
Joined: 19 Mar 2015 Posts: 2363
|
Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mods moved this thread to the NBA Draft sub forum and left the Ball/Fultz threads in the main lounge.
That's some cold ish |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vdogg11 Starting Rotation
Joined: 08 Apr 2017 Posts: 202
|
Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tj24 wrote: | That's my guy. I hope he kills the workout and blows them away. The thought of him and Ingram on the wings for the next 10 years is $$$ |
I could not agree more. and I think he could play SG. we need DEFENSE on this team! if Jackson shoots well in his workout, I don't see why we wouldn't take him. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chronicle Retired Number
Joined: 21 Jul 2012 Posts: 31943 Location: Manhattan
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am open to this pick _________________ Kobe |
|
Back to top |
|
|
underdogsgv Starting Rotation
Joined: 23 Jun 2016 Posts: 124 Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
He's Marvin Williams v2.0, only with character issues. _________________ #32 is the greatest Laker ever. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LAKERMIKE2 Star Player
Joined: 26 Oct 2005 Posts: 2096 Location: Jack's Crib
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I believe it's in our best interest to draft Josh Jackson! Reason being Davia Nwaba & Tyler Ennis showed promise in Luke's system, we have a nice 4 guard rotation with Clarkson also. Get rid if Swaggy or make him sixth man again.
The problem is like other posters have said we lack athletic front court players & defenders, Ingram & Jackson would be a nice building block with Randle & Zubac playing the 5 spot.
Jackson surely needs to improve his jumper, but Ball's release is only good for open shots & Ball does seem like a Jason Kidd player where Jackson gives us another defender if we don't get PG13 whenever? I would not be disappointed if we added Jackson even with a trade down to #3 pick?
I just want to see DLO & Ingram play together for at least another year to see what they both can do, if we do take Ball, then that certainly give DLO the green light to throw up more shots at SG. Ingram should be much better next year & I expect him to flourish with the 3 ball also... _________________ My Laker squad.
Mr. Clutch, Nixon, Eddie, Nick, Magic, Kareem,
Silk, Cooper, AC, Worthy, Horry, Shaq, Kobe.
HC: Riley |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chronicle Retired Number
Joined: 21 Jul 2012 Posts: 31943 Location: Manhattan
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
why did this thread get moved? it's a three-way race right? please move it back _________________ Kobe |
|
Back to top |
|
|
leor_77 Franchise Player
Joined: 23 Mar 2012 Posts: 21920
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chronicle wrote: | why did this thread get moved? it's a three-way race right? please move it back |
Yeah, tell me about it. I'm guessing the Mod is a really big Lonzo fan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Iversondalivest1 Starting Rotation
Joined: 06 Dec 2013 Posts: 293
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JJax is my pick. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrDent Franchise Player
Joined: 30 Jun 2016 Posts: 12975
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
leor_77 wrote: | Chronicle wrote: | why did this thread get moved? it's a three-way race right? please move it back |
Yeah, tell me about it. I'm guessing the Mod is a really big Lonzo fan. |
Just noticed this as well.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
unleasHell Franchise Player
Joined: 16 Apr 2001 Posts: 11823 Location: Stay Thirsty my Friends
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lakers need a PG that is a PLAYMAKER, someone who can average 6=10apg.
They don't have one, so unless they can sign CP3, BALL is the answer... _________________ What does Marcellus Wallace look like? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrDent Franchise Player
Joined: 30 Jun 2016 Posts: 12975
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
unleasHell wrote: | Lakers need a PG that is a PLAYMAKER, someone who can average 6=10apg.
They don't have one, so unless they can sign CP3, BALL is the answer... |
Dlo and JJ backcourt works for me |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hdtvset Starting Rotation
Joined: 07 Jun 2014 Posts: 210 Location: LA
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Batguano wrote: | Mods moved this thread to the NBA Draft sub forum and left the Ball/Fultz threads in the main lounge.
That's some cold ish |
Agree! I want Jackson! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chronicle Retired Number
Joined: 21 Jul 2012 Posts: 31943 Location: Manhattan
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
unleasHell wrote: | Lakers need a PG that is a PLAYMAKER, someone who can average 6=10apg.
They don't have one, so unless they can sign CP3, BALL is the answer... |
We don't need a 6-10 apg player. There hasn't been one on the championship team for over a decade
Our assists will come from having all around passers in every spot, including Randle, Ingram, Zubac, and if we draft him - Jackson _________________ Kobe |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AFireInside619 Franchise Player
Joined: 11 Dec 2015 Posts: 11449
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2017 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is a repost on the Draft Thread over at the LA Lakers Lounge section, but I'll post it here too. Maybe they'll move thread over soon.
So today Brian Windhorst said on the SAS Podcast that the Lakers are sending Vibes that they really like Josh Jackson. Windhorst said that he doesn't know if it is for trade purposes or just to get their fanbase ready for the disappointment of not drafting Ball, but he said the vibes are out there.
If any one cares to listen, it's 12 mins in if the second hour of the SAS podcast. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrDent Franchise Player
Joined: 30 Jun 2016 Posts: 12975
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AFireInside619 wrote: | This is a repost on the Draft Thread over at the LA Lakers Lounge section, but I'll post it here too. Maybe they'll move thread over soon.
So today Brian Windhorst said on the SAS Podcast that the Lakers are sending Vibes that they really like Josh Jackson. Windhorst said that he doesn't know if it is for trade purposes or just to get their fanbase ready for the disappointment of not drafting Ball, but he said the vibes are out there.
If any one cares to listen, it's 12 mins in if the second hour of the SAS podcast. |
Interesting. Haven't seen any written articles picking this up yet. I'll see if I can track down the podcast. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrDent Franchise Player
Joined: 30 Jun 2016 Posts: 12975
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok so I listened. Windhorsts answer wasn't even a direct response to a question (re Lavar Ball) instead he just went on a Jackson discussion.
Thing is I've seen nothing written to support "vibes" sent out by lakers of some specific great interest in Jackson...aside from captain obvious only other guy I've seen an article of lakers giving a "hard look" into is fox. For whatever that's worth. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiendishoc Star Player
Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 8488 Location: The (real) short corner
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
unleasHell wrote: | Lakers need a PG that is a PLAYMAKER, someone who can average 6=10apg.
They don't have one, so unless they can sign CP3, BALL is the answer... |
So what you're saying is to play D'angelo as many minutes as other starting point guards? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
unleasHell Franchise Player
Joined: 16 Apr 2001 Posts: 11823 Location: Stay Thirsty my Friends
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chronicle wrote: | unleasHell wrote: | Lakers need a PG that is a PLAYMAKER, someone who can average 6=10apg.
They don't have one, so unless they can sign CP3, BALL is the answer... |
We don't need a 6-10 apg player. There hasn't been one on the championship team for over a decade
Our assists will come from having all around passers in every spot, including Randle, Ingram, Zubac, and if we draft him - Jackson |
Yeah and THAT"S the problem! Our starting PG averaged 4.8 apg, which ranked him 25th in the NBA! The Lakers need a PG who can hit the open man for a high percentage shot, not a PG that dribbles in down the court and waits for the the other four guys to get down there so they can pass the ball around until there is 4 seconds left and then lunch a desperation shot - this is exactly why the Lakers shoot a low percentage overall... _________________ What does Marcellus Wallace look like? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KeepItRealOrElse Retired Number
Joined: 11 Oct 2012 Posts: 32767
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
unleasHell wrote: | Chronicle wrote: | unleasHell wrote: | Lakers need a PG that is a PLAYMAKER, someone who can average 6=10apg.
They don't have one, so unless they can sign CP3, BALL is the answer... |
We don't need a 6-10 apg player. There hasn't been one on the championship team for over a decade
Our assists will come from having all around passers in every spot, including Randle, Ingram, Zubac, and if we draft him - Jackson |
Yeah and THAT"S the problem! Our starting PG averaged 4.8 apg, which ranked him 25th in the NBA! The Lakers need a PG who can hit the open man for a high percentage shot, not a PG that dribbles in down the court and waits for the the other four guys to get down there so they can pass the ball around until there is 4 seconds left and then lunch a desperation shot - this is exactly why the Lakers shoot a low percentage overall... |
Dude in terms of shooters around our PG - we're probably 30th in the league in talent there. You need players who can shoot............to get assists. 5 assists without that, is actually impressive, no doubt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiendishoc Star Player
Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 8488 Location: The (real) short corner
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
unleasHell wrote: | Chronicle wrote: | unleasHell wrote: | Lakers need a PG that is a PLAYMAKER, someone who can average 6=10apg.
They don't have one, so unless they can sign CP3, BALL is the answer... |
We don't need a 6-10 apg player. There hasn't been one on the championship team for over a decade
Our assists will come from having all around passers in every spot, including Randle, Ingram, Zubac, and if we draft him - Jackson |
Yeah and THAT"S the problem! Our starting PG averaged 4.8 apg, which ranked him 25th in the NBA! The Lakers need a PG who can hit the open man for a high percentage shot, not a PG that dribbles in down the court and waits for the the other four guys to get down there so they can pass the ball around until there is 4 seconds left and then lunch a desperation shot - this is exactly why the Lakers shoot a low percentage overall... |
Because of the willful blindless, I'll spell it out for you. If he got as many minutes as other starting guards, he'd be at 6 assists per game. He had more assists per minute than Damian Lillard, who played with better shooters, including stretch bigs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DangeRuss Star Player
Joined: 10 Feb 2016 Posts: 1418
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2017 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can we put this back into the main forums since it's been reported to be a 50/50 spilt in our front office between Jackson and ball |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chronicle Retired Number
Joined: 21 Jul 2012 Posts: 31943 Location: Manhattan
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2017 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
DangeRuss wrote: | Can we put this back into the main forums since it's been reported to be a 50/50 spilt in our front office between Jackson and ball |
The official draft thread is essentially the official josh jackson thread now _________________ Kobe |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HellCrowe Starting Rotation
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 304
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2017 6:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
We definitely must revive this thread. I know Ball and Fultz are the consensus almost everywhere but there is talk that Josh Jackson could be the pick. I mean, i would love Ball but with the talk of intensity, defense, that kobe mindset, i think Josh Jackson is the closest. From day 1 I think his intensity rises everyone's awareness. The closer we get to the draft, I find myself drifting and liking his corner more and more.
Magic and the Lakers talk a lot about Ball and I am starting to believe it may be a smoke screen. It's Magic right? He puts his emotions on his sleeve right? However, we may just be buying into the dumb card and everyone is falling for it. He is a successful business guy for a reason.
Then there are rumors surfacing that Ball isn't the guy and while Ball fits perfectly with our offense, he doesn't strike me as the guy who will come in and command the leadership role or make guys accountable. Also, while Lavar is too out spoken, Lonzo is the polar opposite.
Up until last weekend, I always thought Ball or Fultz but watching Josh Jackson reminds me just how good he is and wants to be. Listening into Pelinka and Magic, seems like he fills those traits. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|