NEW GENERAL FREE AGENCY/TRADE THREAD
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 3152, 3153, 3154 ... 3207, 3208, 3209  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 145166
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 2:34 pm    Post subject:

anth2000 wrote:
Again, no one in their right mind wants LaVine. Not sure why he keeps coming up. He is still owed 43, 45 and 48 million dollars per season.

He is always injured. He doesn't help the team.


You only want him if you can get 2 first round picks with him.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 28260

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 2:44 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
anth2000 wrote:
Again, no one in their right mind wants LaVine. Not sure why he keeps coming up. He is still owed 43, 45 and 48 million dollars per season.

He is always injured. He doesn't help the team.


You only want him if you can get 2 first round picks with him.


Because it would mean you're tanking.
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 145166
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 2:54 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
anth2000 wrote:
Again, no one in their right mind wants LaVine. Not sure why he keeps coming up. He is still owed 43, 45 and 48 million dollars per season.

He is always injured. He doesn't help the team.


You only want him if you can get 2 first round picks with him.


Because it would mean you're tanking.


This team isn’t winning with or without him, you might as well look to the future. Though I really don’t trust this FO.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 28260

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 3:01 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
MJST wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
anth2000 wrote:
Again, no one in their right mind wants LaVine. Not sure why he keeps coming up. He is still owed 43, 45 and 48 million dollars per season.

He is always injured. He doesn't help the team.


You only want him if you can get 2 first round picks with him.


Because it would mean you're tanking.


This team isn’t winning with or without him, you might as well look to the future. Though I really don’t trust this FO.


Team is definitely winning without him. Also AD and LBJs seasons aren't going to be spent tanking. Gotta look at things actually realistically.
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Halflife
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 19155

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 3:41 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
MJST wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
anth2000 wrote:
Again, no one in their right mind wants LaVine. Not sure why he keeps coming up. He is still owed 43, 45 and 48 million dollars per season.

He is always injured. He doesn't help the team.


You only want him if you can get 2 first round picks with him.


Because it would mean you're tanking.


This team isn’t winning with or without him, you might as well look to the future. Though I really don’t trust this FO.


Team is definitely winning without him. Also AD and LBJs seasons aren't going to be spent tanking. Gotta look at things actually realistically.

its a soft tank -
_________________
Iman Shumpert, believes LBJ's decision to constantly team up with other All-Stars eschewed the idea of superstars continually adding layers to their repertoire.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 48592

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 3:59 pm    Post subject:

So weird looking at Lillard’s level of play this season, he spoke about how motivated he was coming off of the Bucks playoff exit and now he’s literally tanking his own value, no way with his talent level that he should be scoring 14 pts on 4-15 shooting and 1-8 from 3, if his trade value is low I would hurry up and trade DLO and Vando to the Bucks and see if playing with LeBron can lit a fire under his ass
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 28260

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:06 pm    Post subject:

Halflife wrote:
MJST wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
MJST wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
anth2000 wrote:
Again, no one in their right mind wants LaVine. Not sure why he keeps coming up. He is still owed 43, 45 and 48 million dollars per season.

He is always injured. He doesn't help the team.


You only want him if you can get 2 first round picks with him.


Because it would mean you're tanking.


This team isn’t winning with or without him, you might as well look to the future. Though I really don’t trust this FO.


Team is definitely winning without him. Also AD and LBJs seasons aren't going to be spent tanking. Gotta look at things actually realistically.

its a soft tank -


We have no first round pick, so tanking only gives New Orleans a higher pick.
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 145166
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:30 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Halflife wrote:
MJST wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
MJST wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
anth2000 wrote:
Again, no one in their right mind wants LaVine. Not sure why he keeps coming up. He is still owed 43, 45 and 48 million dollars per season.

He is always injured. He doesn't help the team.


You only want him if you can get 2 first round picks with him.


Because it would mean you're tanking.


This team isn’t winning with or without him, you might as well look to the future. Though I really don’t trust this FO.


Team is definitely winning without him. Also AD and LBJs seasons aren't going to be spent tanking. Gotta look at things actually realistically.

its a soft tank -


We have no first round pick, so tanking only gives New Orleans a higher pick.


That’s why you trade for first round picks. They can be turned into players or currency. HL is kind of correct, I don’t think that the intention is to lose but they haven’t done anything to win.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Halflife
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 19155

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:43 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Halflife wrote:
MJST wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
MJST wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
anth2000 wrote:
Again, no one in their right mind wants LaVine. Not sure why he keeps coming up. He is still owed 43, 45 and 48 million dollars per season.

He is always injured. He doesn't help the team.


You only want him if you can get 2 first round picks with him.


Because it would mean you're tanking.


This team isn’t winning with or without him, you might as well look to the future. Though I really don’t trust this FO.


Team is definitely winning without him. Also AD and LBJs seasons aren't going to be spent tanking. Gotta look at things actually realistically.

its a soft tank -


We have no first round pick, so tanking only gives New Orleans a higher pick.
we're not 1st pick in the draft tanking- we are playin, lose in the first round tanking- that way excuses are easily made- vs real tanking and trying to get picks
_________________
Iman Shumpert, believes LBJ's decision to constantly team up with other All-Stars eschewed the idea of superstars continually adding layers to their repertoire.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Denny_Russo
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 Jan 2016
Posts: 3690

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:51 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Halflife wrote:
MJST wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
MJST wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
anth2000 wrote:
Again, no one in their right mind wants LaVine. Not sure why he keeps coming up. He is still owed 43, 45 and 48 million dollars per season.

He is always injured. He doesn't help the team.


You only want him if you can get 2 first round picks with him.


Because it would mean you're tanking.


This team isn’t winning with or without him, you might as well look to the future. Though I really don’t trust this FO.


Team is definitely winning without him. Also AD and LBJs seasons aren't going to be spent tanking. Gotta look at things actually realistically.

its a soft tank -


We have no first round pick, so tanking only gives New Orleans a higher pick.


Atlanta has the pick now. NO traded it for Dejounte.
_________________
Yi Jianlian Fanboy. Respect The Chair.
Starting anew. I'm retiring my main.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 48592

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:11 pm    Post subject:

Imagine if we had Kyle Kuzma on this team instead of Rui “blackhole” Hachimura, let’s send Rui back to the Wizards
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 19311

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:13 pm    Post subject:

yea imagine if we had 43.2% TS% kuzma on our team
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
panamaniac
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 11556
Location: PTY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:18 pm    Post subject:

If I can get Lavine with two first round picks attached in exchange for some combo of Dlo, Rui, Gabe, JHS I.e. guys I don’t intend to keep long term, then I’m making that trade all day. But if Chicago views Lavine as a positive asset then forget it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
levon
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Oct 2016
Posts: 12624

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:32 pm    Post subject:

panamaniac wrote:
If I can get Lavine with two first round picks attached in exchange for some combo of Dlo, Rui, Gabe, JHS I.e. guys I don’t intend to keep long term, then I’m making that trade all day. But if Chicago views Lavine as a positive asset then forget it.

Why would Chicago attach two firsts to take back our garbage when they actually need picks to rebuild? Any trade involving LaVine would involve zero picks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 19311

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:43 pm    Post subject:

A trade that works:
Vincent/Vando/Russell/JHS

JHS is useless, Vando cannot stay healthy. You're trading Vincent + Russell for LaVine. LaVine is an upgrade on Russell. Vincent can easily be replaced by Christie as your "plays defense and does nothing of note on offense."

The Bulls do it because they ditch LaVine's awful contract without attaching picks. They do have to take back Vando (long term salary) and Vincent (expires in 2026).

The Lakers upgrade without spending a first round pick. They're still not contenders, but you still have Rui, Christie, VM, picks to try to trade for someone up to ~$28M in salary
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
miggz23
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 8160

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:48 pm    Post subject:

levon wrote:
panamaniac wrote:
If I can get Lavine with two first round picks attached in exchange for some combo of Dlo, Rui, Gabe, JHS I.e. guys I don’t intend to keep long term, then I’m making that trade all day. But if Chicago views Lavine as a positive asset then forget it.

Why would Chicago attach two firsts to take back our garbage when they actually need picks to rebuild? Any trade involving LaVine would involve zero picks.


Yea I think the Lavine+1st package during the offseason have long gone sailed… Specially the more he plays and as the season goes on. You might even have some borderline time eventually trade for him by the deadline.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
leking006
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 12 Oct 2018
Posts: 6574

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:50 pm    Post subject:

Jazz benched Walker Kessler, Pelinka should make a move for fvcks sake.

DLo is an expiring contract, I dont get it why its hard for Pelinka to trade him. Rebuilding teams want players with expiring contract.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
levon
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Oct 2016
Posts: 12624

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 10:05 pm    Post subject:

tox wrote:
A trade that works:
Vincent/Vando/Russell/JHS

JHS is useless, Vando cannot stay healthy. You're trading Vincent + Russell for LaVine. LaVine is an upgrade on Russell. Vincent can easily be replaced by Christie as your "plays defense and does nothing of note on offense."

The Bulls do it because they ditch LaVine's awful contract without attaching picks. They do have to take back Vando (long term salary) and Vincent (expires in 2026).

The Lakers upgrade without spending a first round pick. They're still not contenders, but you still have Rui, Christie, VM, picks to try to trade for someone up to ~$28M in salary

I proposed this exact trade a few pages ago
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 48592

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 10:11 pm    Post subject:

Looking at tox’s trade idea here what something that might work…

Lakers get LaVine and Kessler

Jazz get JHS / Duarte / Lakers 2029 pick / Bulls 1st round pick

3rd team gets Vincent and Hayes

Bulls get DLO/Vando/Max Lewis
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
anth2000
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Apr 2001
Posts: 12937
Location: Pasadena, CA

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 10:20 pm    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
Imagine if we had Kyle Kuzma on this team instead of Rui “blackhole” Hachimura, let’s send Rui back to the Wizards


Except Kuzma sucks, IG.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
anth2000
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Apr 2001
Posts: 12937
Location: Pasadena, CA

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 10:22 pm    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
Looking at tox’s trade idea here what something that might work…

Lakers get LaVine and Kessler

Jazz get JHS / Duarte / Lakers 2029 pick / Bulls 1st round pick

3rd team gets Vincent and Hayes

Bulls get DLO/Vando/Max Lewis


No, IG, gotta stop this LaVine talk.
He’s owed $43, 45 and 48 million still.
He’s always hurt.

Does that sound like a smart trade to you?
The answer is NO!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 19311

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 10:31 pm    Post subject:

levon wrote:
tox wrote:
A trade that works:
Vincent/Vando/Russell/JHS

JHS is useless, Vando cannot stay healthy. You're trading Vincent + Russell for LaVine. LaVine is an upgrade on Russell. Vincent can easily be replaced by Christie as your "plays defense and does nothing of note on offense."

The Bulls do it because they ditch LaVine's awful contract without attaching picks. They do have to take back Vando (long term salary) and Vincent (expires in 2026).

The Lakers upgrade without spending a first round pick. They're still not contenders, but you still have Rui, Christie, VM, picks to try to trade for someone up to ~$28M in salary

I proposed this exact trade a few pages ago

I'm sure the Bulls would try to extract a FRP from Rob (wouldn't be surprised if he acquiesces given we gave one up for (bleep) Westbrook). I still don't really like the trade I'll be honest but it works. Still have a huge hole in terms of wing defense & backup C
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 48592

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 11:18 pm    Post subject:

With Chet out 8-10 weeks, maybe OKC would be willing to absorb Hayes and Vincent or maybe they aim higher and try getting Poeltl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
panamaniac
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 11556
Location: PTY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 11:55 pm    Post subject:

levon wrote:
panamaniac wrote:
If I can get Lavine with two first round picks attached in exchange for some combo of Dlo, Rui, Gabe, JHS I.e. guys I don’t intend to keep long term, then I’m making that trade all day. But if Chicago views Lavine as a positive asset then forget it.

Why would Chicago attach two firsts to take back our garbage when they actually need picks to rebuild? Any trade involving LaVine would involve zero picks.


Because his contract is horrendous, and no team has traded for him. Not saying it will happen but that’s what it would take. I’m guessing Chicago will bite the bullet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 19311

PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2024 12:31 am    Post subject:

panamaniac wrote:
levon wrote:
panamaniac wrote:
If I can get Lavine with two first round picks attached in exchange for some combo of Dlo, Rui, Gabe, JHS I.e. guys I don’t intend to keep long term, then I’m making that trade all day. But if Chicago views Lavine as a positive asset then forget it.

Why would Chicago attach two firsts to take back our garbage when they actually need picks to rebuild? Any trade involving LaVine would involve zero picks.


Because his contract is horrendous, and no team has traded for him. Not saying it will happen but that’s what it would take. I’m guessing Chicago will bite the bullet.

If you need to attach picks to trade LaVine they will simply not trade him.
But some team desperate to improve will trade for him. That team might be the Lakers, if there aren't better options at the deadline.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 3152, 3153, 3154 ... 3207, 3208, 3209  Next
Page 3153 of 3209
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB