Joined: 02 Jan 2011 Posts: 36081 Location: 502 Bad Gateway
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 1:46 pm Post subject:
BigGameHames wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
Ohhhh good ol PPG.
I already explained his eFG the last two years was higher than Lamarcus Aldridge's career average... it's higher than Demar DeRozan's for all but one year.
But sure... RPM over points and eFG...
Where did I mention any of those things as a basis for my opinion? I’m allowed to have an opinion based off watching the game. I’m sorry it angers you but I believe if you objectively watch him, it’s pretty clear he’s a borderline starter right now. Either way, that’s not calling him a bust at all.
I'm not angry with you at all.
I think he's a mid level starter who will continue to improve
You think he's a borderline starter.
I have no problem with you because I don't think you are a troll.
We just disagree.
I’m so relieved.
Let me ask you... do you rank Ingram around 140 to 160 of all NBA players?
Because for me... that's a borderline starter if there are 150 starters.
Even 100th isn't close to the borderline.
Just curious.
I don’t have rankings for that many NBA teams. He’s a borderline starter on a Lakers team with a below average roster that LeBron has propped up. He’s closer to a good bench player than average starter.
He's definitely not as good as Lance. Eye test, stats, eFG!, whatever metric you want
I already explained his eFG the last two years was higher than Lamarcus Aldridge's career average... it's higher than Demar DeRozan's for all but one year.
But sure... RPM over points and eFG...
Where did I mention any of those things as a basis for my opinion? I’m allowed to have an opinion based off watching the game. I’m sorry it angers you but I believe if you objectively watch him, it’s pretty clear he’s a borderline starter right now. Either way, that’s not calling him a bust at all.
I'm not angry with you at all.
I think he's a mid level starter who will continue to improve
You think he's a borderline starter.
I have no problem with you because I don't think you are a troll.
We just disagree.
I’m so relieved.
Let me ask you... do you rank Ingram around 140 to 160 of all NBA players?
Because for me... that's a borderline starter if there are 150 starters.
Even 100th isn't close to the borderline.
Just curious.
I don’t have rankings for that many NBA teams. He’s a borderline starter on a Lakers team with a below average roster that LeBron has propped up. He’s closer to a good bench player than average starter.
A borderline starter is someone who is around the 150th best player in the league.
That's a completely different thing than saying he should be a 6th man on a high quality team.
I already explained his eFG the last two years was higher than Lamarcus Aldridge's career average... it's higher than Demar DeRozan's for all but one year.
But sure... RPM over points and eFG...
Where did I mention any of those things as a basis for my opinion? I’m allowed to have an opinion based off watching the game. I’m sorry it angers you but I believe if you objectively watch him, it’s pretty clear he’s a borderline starter right now. Either way, that’s not calling him a bust at all.
I'm not angry with you at all.
I think he's a mid level starter who will continue to improve
You think he's a borderline starter.
I have no problem with you because I don't think you are a troll.
We just disagree.
I’m so relieved.
Let me ask you... do you rank Ingram around 140 to 160 of all NBA players?
Because for me... that's a borderline starter if there are 150 starters.
Even 100th isn't close to the borderline.
Just curious.
I don’t have rankings for that many NBA teams. He’s a borderline starter on a Lakers team with a below average roster that LeBron has propped up. He’s closer to a good bench player than average starter.
He's definitely not as good as Lance. Eye test, stats, eFG!, whatever metric you want
So you'd trade Ingram for Lance if he was on another team?
I already explained his eFG the last two years was higher than Lamarcus Aldridge's career average... it's higher than Demar DeRozan's for all but one year.
But sure... RPM over points and eFG...
Where did I mention any of those things as a basis for my opinion? I’m allowed to have an opinion based off watching the game. I’m sorry it angers you but I believe if you objectively watch him, it’s pretty clear he’s a borderline starter right now. Either way, that’s not calling him a bust at all.
I'm not angry with you at all.
I think he's a mid level starter who will continue to improve
You think he's a borderline starter.
I have no problem with you because I don't think you are a troll.
We just disagree.
I’m so relieved.
Let me ask you... do you rank Ingram around 140 to 160 of all NBA players?
Because for me... that's a borderline starter if there are 150 starters.
Even 100th isn't close to the borderline.
Just curious.
I don’t have rankings for that many NBA teams. He’s a borderline starter on a Lakers team with a below average roster that LeBron has propped up. He’s closer to a good bench player than average starter.
A borderline starter is someone who is around the 150th best player in the league.
That's a completely different thing than saying he should be a 6th man on a high quality team.
I wouldn't argue if someone said that.
A 6th man on a lottery team being propped up by the best player in the game is a borderline starter. The Lakers are only a high quality team because of LeBron.
I already explained his eFG the last two years was higher than Lamarcus Aldridge's career average... it's higher than Demar DeRozan's for all but one year.
But sure... RPM over points and eFG...
Where did I mention any of those things as a basis for my opinion? I’m allowed to have an opinion based off watching the game. I’m sorry it angers you but I believe if you objectively watch him, it’s pretty clear he’s a borderline starter right now. Either way, that’s not calling him a bust at all.
I'm not angry with you at all.
I think he's a mid level starter who will continue to improve
You think he's a borderline starter.
I have no problem with you because I don't think you are a troll.
We just disagree.
I’m so relieved.
Let me ask you... do you rank Ingram around 140 to 160 of all NBA players?
Because for me... that's a borderline starter if there are 150 starters.
Even 100th isn't close to the borderline.
Just curious.
I don’t have rankings for that many NBA teams. He’s a borderline starter on a Lakers team with a below average roster that LeBron has propped up. He’s closer to a good bench player than average starter.
A borderline starter is someone who is around the 150th best player in the league.
That's a completely different thing than saying he should be a 6th man on a high quality team.
I wouldn't argue if someone said that.
A 6th man on a lottery team being propped up by the best player in the game is a borderline starter. The Lakers are only a high quality team because of LeBron.
I'll go through the league if I have time and see.
But something tells me he'll be far above the 140 to 160 level.
I expect our team to suck tonight due to all the trade rumors, only fueling LA's offer for AD. _________________ I was horribly wrong about Brandon Ingram.
Joined: 02 Jan 2011 Posts: 36081 Location: 502 Bad Gateway
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:11 pm Post subject:
Sentient Meat wrote:
greenfrog wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
Ohhhh good ol PPG.
I already explained his eFG the last two years was higher than Lamarcus Aldridge's career average... it's higher than Demar DeRozan's for all but one year.
But sure... RPM over points and eFG...
Where did I mention any of those things as a basis for my opinion? I’m allowed to have an opinion based off watching the game. I’m sorry it angers you but I believe if you objectively watch him, it’s pretty clear he’s a borderline starter right now. Either way, that’s not calling him a bust at all.
I'm not angry with you at all.
I think he's a mid level starter who will continue to improve
You think he's a borderline starter.
I have no problem with you because I don't think you are a troll.
We just disagree.
I’m so relieved.
Let me ask you... do you rank Ingram around 140 to 160 of all NBA players?
Because for me... that's a borderline starter if there are 150 starters.
Even 100th isn't close to the borderline.
Just curious.
I don’t have rankings for that many NBA teams. He’s a borderline starter on a Lakers team with a below average roster that LeBron has propped up. He’s closer to a good bench player than average starter.
He's definitely not as good as Lance. Eye test, stats, eFG!, whatever metric you want
So you'd trade Ingram for Lance if he was on another team?
Just to be clear...
Trade value is a totally different animal, and you know it.
I already explained his eFG the last two years was higher than Lamarcus Aldridge's career average... it's higher than Demar DeRozan's for all but one year.
But sure... RPM over points and eFG...
Where did I mention any of those things as a basis for my opinion? I’m allowed to have an opinion based off watching the game. I’m sorry it angers you but I believe if you objectively watch him, it’s pretty clear he’s a borderline starter right now. Either way, that’s not calling him a bust at all.
I'm not angry with you at all.
I think he's a mid level starter who will continue to improve
You think he's a borderline starter.
I have no problem with you because I don't think you are a troll.
We just disagree.
I’m so relieved.
Let me ask you... do you rank Ingram around 140 to 160 of all NBA players?
Because for me... that's a borderline starter if there are 150 starters.
Even 100th isn't close to the borderline.
Just curious.
I don’t have rankings for that many NBA teams. He’s a borderline starter on a Lakers team with a below average roster that LeBron has propped up. He’s closer to a good bench player than average starter.
He's definitely not as good as Lance. Eye test, stats, eFG!, whatever metric you want
So you'd trade Ingram for Lance if he was on another team?
Just to be clear...
Trade value is a totally different animal, and you know it.
So only you have the secret knowledge of Lance's superiority... and the rest of us are deluded fools holding on to potential that will never be realized.
Come on man... no one thinks Lance is better than Ingram except maybe at one on one street ball, and even that I'm not sure about because Lance can't guard him.
Joined: 03 Oct 2003 Posts: 8442 Location: Santa Monica
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:16 pm Post subject:
Unless Zubac has a great game and contains Embiid, this might be a "mail in the stats" kind of game. Philly has scary potential. _________________ Lakers 49ers Chargers Dodgers
The only worse part than the forgone conclusion of a loss? Hearing D. Scott talk. That dude does not belong on tv, he has no endearing factors at all. He played a few seasons with Shaq, that is all he did.
Joel Embiid expected to play vs. Lakers despite missing shootaround; Sixers teammate Jonah Bolden out
Quote:
Joel Embiid is expected to play Tuesday night against the Los Angeles Lakers despite missing the morning shootaround at Santa Monica High School.
The 76ers center is dealing with an upset stomach. Sixers reserve post player Jonah Bolden will miss the game at the Staples Center because of right Achilles soreness.
Joel Embiid expected to play vs. Lakers despite missing shootaround; Sixers teammate Jonah Bolden out
Quote:
Joel Embiid is expected to play Tuesday night against the Los Angeles Lakers despite missing the morning shootaround at Santa Monica High School.
The 76ers center is dealing with an upset stomach. Sixers reserve post player Jonah Bolden will miss the game at the Staples Center because of right Achilles soreness.
Joined: 02 Jan 2011 Posts: 36081 Location: 502 Bad Gateway
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:34 pm Post subject:
Sentient Meat wrote:
So only you have the secret knowledge of Lance's superiority... and the rest of us are deluded fools holding on to potential that will never be realized.
Come on man... no one thinks Lance is better than Ingram except maybe at one on one street ball, and even that I'm not sure about because Lance can't guard him.
He's literally better at everything except maybe defense, and that's largely subjective.
And who's relying more on streetball... the guy who can shoot threes or the one dribbling into traffic?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum